{"id":20723,"date":"2017-03-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2017-03-21T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/global2020prd.wpengine.com\/insights\/matrix-management-building-skills\/"},"modified":"2026-02-07T13:48:29","modified_gmt":"2026-02-07T13:48:29","slug":"matrix-management-building-skills","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.global-integration.com\/insights\/matrix-management-building-skills\/","title":{"rendered":"Matrix management skills: why the skills phase is the most neglected stage of matrix implementation"},"content":{"rendered":"

Organizations typically invest heavily in the first three \u201cSs\u201d of matrix implementation\u2014strategy, structure, and systems. Yet many underestimate the importance of the fourth and most critical phase: matrix management skills<\/strong><\/a>. This skills phase determines whether the matrix becomes a high\u2011performing way of working or a costly redesign that never reaches its potential. This article explains why leaders often overlook matrix management skills, why this creates risk, and what they must do to close the capability gap.<\/p>\n

Why do organizations neglect the skills phase in matrix implementation?<\/h2>\n

Most large transformations begin with significant investment in strategy, structural redesign, and new systems. By the time organizations reach the skills phase, senior leadership teams are often fatigued. As one colleague describes it, many experience \u201cfour \u2018S\u2019 fatigue,\u201d<\/strong> where the organization simply runs out of energy to develop the behaviors needed to make the matrix work.<\/p>\n

\n
\ud83d\udd0e Review Note<\/div>\n
This legacy article has been retained due to its ongoing relevance.
\nIt was lightly updated in [February 2026]<\/strong> to maintain accuracy and improve clarity.
\nFor the latest thinking, see our updated Matrix Management Guide<\/a>.
\n.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

This fatigue leads to a common but flawed assumption: that people will automatically adapt to matrix working once systems and structures are in place. However, matrix environments represent a fundamental increase in complexity<\/strong>, requiring people to collaborate across distance, cultures, time zones, and multiple stakeholder groups simultaneously.<\/p>\n

Without a deliberate investment in matrix management skills, even well\u2011designed matrices struggle.<\/p>\n

What happens when these skills are ignored?<\/h2>\n

Our IT organization introduced an integrated regional IT structure for the first time. We ran a successful pilot ‘Matrix skills training’ program based on the key challenges that people expressed in working in the new structure. <\/em><\/p>\n

The IT leadership team needed to approve the workshop for roll out to the wider organization. Unfortunately, they were extremely busy with a major systems implementation, and the review of training kept falling off the agenda. It was listed as ‘any other business’ for twelve successive monthly management meetings. <\/em><\/p>\n

Finally, we learned that the review was no longer required as they had concluded that the structure could not work and were reverting to a more local IT operating model. I was told that the total cost of this decision was $30 million. <\/em>HR, IT Business Partner, Pharmaceuticals<\/strong><\/p>\n

This outcome highlights a widespread issue: organizations often blame the matrix itself when the real issue is the absence of the skills required to make it work.<\/p>\n

Which matrix management skills matter most?<\/h2>\n

Matrix environments require both learning new behaviors<\/strong> and unlearning traditional ones<\/strong>. The most essential skills include:<\/p>\n